As long as it takes
"I want to go back to my
own kids and look them in the face again knowing
that I've done all I can to try and save the children
of Iraq and other countries who are dying because
of my government's unjust, amoral, fear - and money
- driven policies. These children and people of other
countries are every bit as valuable and worthy of
love as my precious wife and children."
How many must die?
Brian started his 24/7 vigil in
2001 to protest about the suffering of Iraqis during
the 1990s because of economic sanctions. He continues
because of all those who have, and continue, to suffer
as a result of the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
In Oct 2004 The Lancet estimated that 100,000
Iraqis have died. In Oct 2006 it was estimated that 655,000
people have died in Iraq as a result of the 2003
invasion (see
more here). And how many millions of other lives
have been blighted for ever?
Send Brian a postcard of support c/o Parliament Square,
London SW1A

This photo was taken by
Gemma Day in Dec 04 for an Independent
on Sunday article.
See all
media articles.
Mark Thomas,
comedian and campaigner, 2004
" ...Now they wish to evict
Brian from his place of protest. Maybe because he
is an embarrassment to
such a war mongering government. Whatever their reason
it is wrong. A democracy that can not stand one
man and some placards outside its front doors doesn't
seem to have much faith in itself. That is
why I support Brian for Parliament."
The heroic Brian
Haw
Letter in The Independent, 2 Aug 05
Sir: Brian Haw has struck a major blow for
international peace in his passive defiance of government aggression in the face
of his peace protest (report, 30 July). I cannot think of anyone who has sacrificed
as much as he has on a personal level in the cause of peace in this country and I
would like to see him being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Andrew Stephenson,
Newhaven, East Sussex
|
|
return
to press releases
Immediate press release
2 April 2006
HOME OFFICE APPEALS PARLIAMENT SQUARE PROTESTOR'S
RIGHT TO STAY
Monday 3 April, 10am, Royal Courts of Justice,
The Strand, London
Brian Haw, the peace protestor who has been staging
a continuous peace demonstration opposite Parliament for nearly
5 years, will again be attending court to hear the case against
his presence in Parliament Square.
The Home Office and the Metropolitan Police are
appealing a High Court judgement made in July last year which
found that the law that had been passed specifically in order
to remove him from Parliament Square did not apply to Mr Haw.
Mr Haw's demonstration had been seen as lawful since
he won his first High Court victory in October 2005. [A] In 2005
the government included new measures within the Serious Organised
Crime and Police Act to legally evict him.
However, when drafting the law, the government specified
that demonstrations must have authorisation from the Metropolitan
Commissioner before they 'start'. Mr Haw defence team argued in
court that it was only in secondary legislation that continuous
protests such as his were covered.
Despite hearing arguments from the Home Office that
the intention was always to remove Mr Haw, the judges found that,
because a criminal offence would be committed by breach of the
new law with the penalty of up to a year in prison, there was
"something sinister" about using secondary legislation
to rewrite the law in this way. The judges found that the new
law did not apply to Brian Haw and that he could continue his
protest without authorisation from the police. [B]
The new law banning unauthorised protest within
the Designated Area (up to 1km around Parliament) has been used
to arrest those maintaining their right to freedom of speech since
it came into force on 1 August 2005. There have been 11 convictions
so far. [C]
CONTACT & INFORMATION:
Brian Haw will be outside the Royal Courts of Justice from 10am
on 3 April.
There will be a demonstration in support of Mr Haw outside the
Royal Courts of Justice
from 10am.
For more information: info@parliament-square.org.uk, www.parliament-square.org.uk
NOTES:
A. www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,4515616-103690,00.html
B. www.guardian.co.uk/antiwar/story/0,,1539340,00.html
C. The provisions in question are sections 132-138
Serious Organised Crime and Police
Act 2005. See www.parliamentprotest.org.uk and www.parliament-square.org.uk/
defendaction.htm for details of protests against the new law and
arrests.
|