As long as it takes
"I want to go back to my
own kids and look them in the face again knowing
that I've done all I can to try and save the children
of Iraq and other countries who are dying because
of my government's unjust, amoral, fear - and money
- driven policies. These children and people of other
countries are every bit as valuable and worthy of
love as my precious wife and children."
How many must die?
Brian started his 24/7 vigil in
2001 to protest about the suffering of Iraqis during
the 1990s because of economic sanctions. He continues
because of all those who have, and continue, to suffer
as a result of the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
In Oct 2004 The Lancet estimated that 100,000
Iraqis have died. In Oct 2006 it was estimated that 655,000
people have died in Iraq as a result of the 2003
invasion (see
more here). And how many millions of other lives
have been blighted for ever?
Send Brian a postcard of support c/o Parliament Square,
London SW1A

This photo was taken by
Gemma Day in Dec 04 for an Independent
on Sunday article.
See all
media articles.
Mark Thomas,
comedian and campaigner, 2004
" ...Now they wish to evict
Brian from his place of protest. Maybe because he
is an embarrassment to
such a war mongering government. Whatever their reason
it is wrong. A democracy that can not stand one
man and some placards outside its front doors doesn't
seem to have much faith in itself. That is
why I support Brian for Parliament."
The heroic Brian
Haw
Letter in The Independent, 2 Aug 05
Sir: Brian Haw has struck a major blow for
international peace in his passive defiance of government aggression in the face
of his peace protest (report, 30 July). I cannot think of anyone who has sacrificed
as much as he has on a personal level in the cause of peace in this country and I
would like to see him being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Andrew Stephenson,
Newhaven, East Sussex
|
|
return
to press releases
Immediate Press Release
Thursday 11 May 2006
POLICE TO START ACTION TO REMOVE BRIAN HAW'S
DISPLAY
The police have given Brian Haw a deadline of 3pm
today, Thursday 11 May, to remove parts of his display in order
to comply with a set of conditions that they are placing on his
demonstration. If no action has been taken by Mr Haw by 3pm, the
police have stated that "action will be taken to enforce
the provision".
Under Section 132 of the Serious Organised Crime
and Police Act 2005 (SOCPA), the police may impose conditions
relating to the place, time and duration of a demonstration, how
many people may attend it, the number and size of banners or placards
used, and maximum permissible noise levels.
After the Court of Appeal decision on 8 May, which
brought Mr Haw's demonstration under SOCPA regulation, he was
given authorisation to continue his protest but informed that
conditions would be applied. By law, outline authorisation must
be given by the police.
Among the conditions the police have imposed on
Mr Haw's demonstration, is one that states that his display must
not be more than 3 metres in any direction. This means that almost
all of Mr Haw's display would have to be removed.
Mr Haw has asked the police for more time to correspond
with them about what he considers to be 'unreasonable' conditions.
Mr Haw said, "It is impossible for me to comply
with the conditions within the timescale given. The net effect
of a serious of 7 comprehensive conditions placed upon me will
be to leave my demonstration hung drawn and quartered. This has
to be challenged."
He continued, "It should not be the duty of
the police to remove this evidence of torture and genocide that
the people of the world are flocking to see."
Mr Haw's solicitors are considering seeking a judicial
review of the conditions that the police have imposed on his protest.
|